Pope Francis waves to followers in Manila, Philippines, January 2015.
| Photo Credit: Getty Images
I heard the news at a working lunch. Pope Francis was gone and I felt a deep sorrow open up within me. It was like losing a… like losing a what? Not a friend but also a friend. A symbol of possibility and a harbinger of change. I do not ask for whom the bell tolls. I know it tolls for all liberal human beings. It has been a long time since we loved a Pope so much.
Change in the air
Towards the end of the John Paul II papacy, it became apparent that the Supreme Pontiff was no longer running the church; a cabal was doing its best to make the 2,000-year-old institution into a meaningless anachronism in a world in flux. Just when you thought it couldn’t get worse, Cardinal Ratzinger was appointed as Bishop of Rome and the decline accelerated as the Holy Father wrote flawed encyclicals, ignored the savagery visited on children and pottered about changing formulae for the Mass, indulging in sophistry while the world was burning around his German ears. I talked to a priest friend who said grimly, “Well, at least there’s only one of him,” referring to the Great Western Schism when there were three men who were claiming the Seat of St. Peter.
Pope Francis celebrates his first Mass with Cardinals at Sistine Chapel at the Vatican on March 14, 2013.
| Photo Credit:
Getty Images
We fell in love with the Papacy again when white smoke streamed out of the chimney of the Sistine Chapel and Cardinal Bergoglio was elected. Here was a Jesuit as a Pope which accounts for much of the change in the way his time in Rome has been conducted. The Jesuits may be the intellectual elites of the church but there has been an amazing lack of sophistry about this Pope who named himself after the simplest and most childlike of saints, Francis of Assisi.
Feeling the pain
He is the People’s Pope in much the same way as Diana, Princess of Wales, was the People’s Princess. He knows the value of the gesture. He knows what it means to the faithful that he is ‘still in touch’ with the many people whom he met as a priest, a bishop, a cardinal; that phrase runs like a leit motif through the book although, in the manner of the great Augustinian Confessions, he is at pains to recount the times he held himself aloof and lived to regret it.
But most of all, he understands the rage and the horror that the church’s protection of paedophiles has generated. He is unstinting in his condemnation in Hope: The Autobiography, cowritten with Carlo Musso and translated from the Italian by Richard Dixon: “The pain of the victims is a lament that rises to heaven, that touches the soul, and which for so long has been ignored, hidden or silenced. In the justified anger of the people, the Church sees the reflection of God’s anger, betrayed and besmirched by these dishonest priests.”
This is a preachment from a Pope and Franciscus does not wait until he has been ordained before he begins. We are treated to small sermons in retrospect as we follow his life but this is as it should be. For if you are going to read a book by a man who managed to get past the traditional dislike that Rome has for Jesuits — the order has been suppressed twice by the very men to whom they swear allegiance in what can only be an example of fine Italian irony — and the presence of an ex-Pope still hanging about Vatican City like a bad odour, you must gird your loins for this.
Act of faith
But he surprises you. How he surprises you. That he should make a postcard of ‘The Standing Boy of Nagasaki’ — a photograph of a little boy of about 10 years old who has the corpse of his dead brother strapped to his back — which he has titled, ‘The Fruit of War’ is remarkable. That he should beg at the feet of the leaders of South Sudan to end the war may be taken as a gesture but it is a gesture that few heads of state would make. That he should weigh in on climate change, that he should tell us that he read Communist literature when he was growing up, that he should refer to Ingmar Bergman and Giovanni Guareschi (on whose Don Camillo series I cut my teeth), that he once helped Jorge Luis Borges shave… all these stretch what you expect of a Papal autobiography.
This 1945 photo taken after the atomic bombing in Nagasaki, Japan, was released Dec. 30, 2017 by Pope Francis. The back side is signed by the Pope and above his name, it says in Italian “…the fruit of war.”
| Photo Credit:
CNS/Joseph Roger O’Donnell via Holy See Press Office
He made me weep. On page 165, he offers us his own credo. It is so beautiful because it is so honest. I would love to reproduce the whole here but space does not permit and so just the first few words: “I want to believe in God the Father, who loves me as a son, and in Jesus…”
It’s that ‘want to believe’ that totally disarmed me, an echo of the father of the ill child in Mark’s gospel who cried out: “Lord, I believe, help Thou mine unbelief”. It reminded me of the time that a big noise was made about Mother Teresa’s — I know she is a saint, but as Pope Francis pointed out at her canonisation, she seems so much more a mother than a saint — long dark night of the soul. Only the irreligious can think of faith as a single calm note; for it is a chorus of voices, some from Heaven, some from the Earth and some from The Other Place, all originating within us. That the Pope himself wants to believe, that he will stand vulnerable before his readers admitting to it, is a great act of faith. As he says, quoting Father Zaragiozi, the future depends on the capacity to listen.
Another lovely line: We cannot love people with weapons in our hands. No, we cannot. But is anyone listening?
The reviewer lives in Bombay and thinks that the Church could learn a lot from Jesus Christ if it wanted to.
Hope
Pope Francis, with Carlo Musso, trs Richard Dixon
Penguin Random House India
₹ 1,099
Published – April 21, 2025 06:09 pm IST
