Bought A ULIP? Here’s What You Were Not Told About Your Investment

Most of us have come across that tempting pitch —

“Sir, this plan gives you market returns, life cover, and tax savings — all in one!”
That “plan” is usually a ULIP — Unit Linked Insurance Plan — a product that sounds intelligent, balanced, and futuristic.

But beneath the sleek marketing lies a web of complexity, confusion, and cost — often discovered only after a few years, when the investor realizes the returns haven’t kept up with even a basic mutual fund.

This article is meant not to dismiss ULIPs entirely — but to decode why they’re widely misunderstood, how they’re sold, and what existing policyholders can still do to make informed decisions.

ULIPs bundle insurance and investment — and in doing so, they systematically underdeliver on both, because the product design and distribution economics favour insurers and agents, not policyholders.

Let’s take a very common, easy-to-follow scenario so you can test your own policy.

• – Annual premium you pay: ₹1,00,000
• – First-year allocation charge (commission + setup): 45% (not uncommon in many traditional ULIPs)
• – Subsequent years’ allocation charge: 25%
• – Annual administration fee: ₹3,600 (₹300/month)
• – Fund management fee: 1.50% p.a.
• – Mortality (cost of life cover) + riders: 1.00% p.a.
• – Gross market return assumed: 10.00% p.a.

1. Premium paid = 100,000.

2. First-year allocation charge = 45% of 100,000 = 0.45 × 100,000 = 45,000.

3. Invested amount after allocation = 100,000 − 45,000 = 55,000.

4. Net annual fund return rate = gross return − fund mgmt − mortality = 10.00% − 1.50% − 1.00% = 7.50% = 0.075 (decimal).

5. Fund value at year-end before admin fee = invested × (1 + 0.075) = 55,000 × 1.075 = 59,125.00.

6. Subtract annual admin fee = 59,125.00 − 3,600 = 55,525.00 (year-1 closing fund value).

The crucial takeaway: a large proportion of early premiums never enter the market; the part that does grows at a net rate materially lower than the headline market return.

I model two common strategies for illustration (all numbers are rounded for clarity):

• – Strategy A — ULIP: You pay ₹1,00,000 per year into a ULIP with the above charges, sum assurance of Rs.10 lakhs and net growth assumptions.
• – Strategy B — Term insurance + Mutual Fund (SIP): You buy Rs. 1 crore term cover (₹30,000/year) and invest the remaining ₹70,000/year in mutual funds with lower total expense ratio (TER) and better net returns (assume 9.00% net p.a. after TER).

• – After 10 years: – ULIP (assumptions above) ≈ ₹10.48 lakh (fund value after 10 premiums and charges).
• – Term + MF ≈ ₹11.59 lakh (fund value from investing ₹70,000 p.a. at 9%).
• – After 20 years:
• – ULIP ≈ ₹32.50 lakh.
• – Term + MF ≈ ₹39.03 lakh.

What this shows: Under realistic charge structures, the term + mutual fund route produces materially higher net wealth over typical horizons — while delivering far better insurance cover for the same or lower outlay.

ULIPs are complex — and that complexity is where value leaks out.

Typical deductions and cost layers:

• – High upfront allocation charge (large portion of your first-year premium, often used to pay commission).
• – Policy administration fees (flat or variable amounts that reduce your fund value yearly).
• – Fund management fees (1%–2% in many ULIP funds, sometimes higher).
• – Mortality/risk charges (the cost of insurance inside the plan; increases with age).
• – Surrender charges / exit penalties (very punitive if you leave early).
• – Switching or transaction fees for moving between funds.

Mutual funds, in contrast, show an all-in-one Expense Ratio (TER) and are generally governed by stricter disclosure rules. ULIPs bury many fees in policy documents and use industry jargon.

ULIP marketing is built on three powerful levers:

1. Emotional language: “Create a legacy for your family” triggers pride and responsibility.

2. Big illustration numbers: Showing a large corpus 20 years later creates FOMO.

3. Convenience / bundle: Insurance + investment + tax benefit — one product to solve everything.

These appeals are effective because they simplify complex trade-offs into a single promise. But bundling eliminates transparency and hides the fact that insurance and investment have different objectives and should usually be optimized separately.

A common ULIP feature: sum assured = 10× annual premium. That is not the same as recommended life cover, which is typically = 10× annual income.

• – If your income is ₹10 lakh, recommended cover = ₹1 crore.
• – With a ULIP offering sum assured = 10×premium, to get ₹1 crore cover you’d need to pay ₹10 lakh premium per year — which is impractical.

By contrast, a term plan can buy ₹1 crore cover for about ₹25,000–₹35,000 a year for a healthy 30-year-old. That difference is the whole point: buy term for protection; buy market exposure separately for wealth creation.

• – ULIPs typically have a 5-year lock-in (you cannot withdraw).
• – Surrender charges are harsh in years 1–5 and can still apply later. Many policyholders who exit around year 5–7 recover significantly less than their cumulative premiums.
• – Persistency ratios (people continuing beyond 3–5 years) historically have not been encouraging — many investors give up when reality does not match early promises.

Practical implication: If you face job loss, illness, or other shocks during the lock-in, your liquidity is constrained and exit penalties bite.

Important and often misunderstood fact: From 2025, certain life insurance premiums (including ULIPs) enjoy a 0% GST line-item. That looks attractive in marketing, but GST exemption is not a solution.

• – GST is an external tax; it is not the product charge. A “GST 0%” label on the premium does not reduce the internal allocation charges, mortality charges, admin fees, and fund management fees that actually reduce your fund value.
• – Mutual funds already show TERs that bake in taxes and fees; ULIPs still hide layers of cost.
• – Insurers may respond to GST changes by altering commissions, bonuses, or other indirect mechanisms — so the headline tax change often gets neutralised elsewhere.

Bottom line: GST exemption does not make the product simpler or cheaper in any meaningful way. Don’t be fooled by a “GST 0%” footnote — dig into the actual charges and net returns.

ULIPs benefit from two important tax-related provisions that make them attractive in sales pitches:

1. Section 80C deduction: Premiums paid for ULIPs are eligible for deduction under Section 80C of the Income Tax Act (subject to the overall 80C limit). This means premiums up to the 80C cap can reduce your taxable income in the year paid.

2. Section 10(10D) — tax-free maturity: Historically, maturity proceeds from ULIPs were tax-exempt under Section 10(10D), which created a strong sales argument: “Earn market returns and get tax-free maturity.”

However, critically important caveats apply:

• – Tax benefits do not offset poor economics. A tax break on a low or eroded fund value is not a compensation for decades of lost returns due to high fees.
• – Policy changes matter. Legislations in recent years has curtailed some tax advantages for very high-premium ULIPs to address misuse as tax shelters. Relying on tax rules that can change is risky.
• – Opportunity cost: The 80C benefit is a one-time annual relief; you could often get similar or better tax-efficient outcomes by combining term insurance (eligible for 80C deductions for premiums of certain policies) and investing via ELSS or tax-efficient mutual funds, PPF, or NPS, which may offer better returns or similar tax sheltering with greater transparency.

In short: Tax benefits are a marketing accelerator, not a financial justification. Evaluate the product on net returns, coverage adequacy, and flexibility — not on the tax line alone.

Also Read: Rupee Pinned Near Record Low But Cushioned By State Banks’ Dollar Sales

ULIPs often pay very high upfront commissions (20%–40% in the first year in many legacy plans). High commissions + attractive sales incentives (trips, awards) create strong seller motivation. Agents naturally prefer to sell products that reward them best, and because ULIPs are commission-heavy, they get marketed aggressively.

This creates misaligned advice: the seller’s interests (commission) conflict with the buyer’s interests (low cost, adequate protection, liquidity).

– SEBI ran a successful public awareness campaign for mutual funds (“Mutual Funds Sahi Hai”).

– IRDAI’s consumer education on ULIPs has been less blunt. A clear public information campaign that explains “Investment ke liye, ULIPs sahi nahi hai” would help consumers enormously.

Regulation can reduce mis-selling, but public education is equally necessary.

Ravi (32): Invested ₹1,00,000 p.a. into a ULIP with a 5-year lock-in. After 5 years of paying premiums, job loss forced him to exit. Total premiums paid: ₹5,00,000. Fund value after surrender charges: ≈ ₹2.6–3.0 lakh — he lost a substantial part of the paid premiums.

Mr. Rao (38): Bought a ULIP in 2013, paid ₹1,00,000 p.a. for 10 years. After 10 years, his ULIP IRR ≈ 6–7%, whereas a diversified equity mutual fund returned ≈ 10–11% in the same period, resulting in a shortfall of ₹3–4 lakh in real wealth for the same nominal money paid.

If you own a ULIP, follow this practical diagnostic and action plan:

• – Latest policy statement (fund value, units, fund performance, charges).
• – Illustration given at time of sale (assumed returns) and premium allocation table.

B. Run a quick numbers check

1. What portion of your premium actually goes into the fund in Year 1?

– Example math: If allocation fee = 45% ⇒ Invested = 100,000 − (100,000 × 0.45) = 55,000.

2. What is the all-in annual charge (fund mgmt + admin + mortality)? If this is >2%–3% p.a., that is material.

3. Calculate your approximate IRR (XIRR) or ask your CA/advisor to do it for the amounts you paid and the current fund value. Compare with a simple benchmark (e.g., a diversified equity fund net return).

C. Ask these direct questions to your insurer/agent

• – Please show a line-by-line schedule: allocation charge, admin charge, fund mgmt fee, mortality charge, surrender schedule (in ₹ and %).
• – What commission did the distributor receive for my policy? (If they refuse to disclose, treat that as a red flag.)
• – What happens if I stop top-ups? What happens if I discontinue premium payments?

• – If your IRR is significantly lower than comparable mutual fund alternatives and your life cover is inadequate, consider:
• – Completing the minimum lock-in period if surrender penalties are severe; then exit and reallocate.
• – Stopping future top-ups; buy a term plan for protection and invest the freed money into low-cost mutual funds or ETFs.
• – If your ULIP has favorable charges (rare but possible in some modern low-cost ULIP variants), and its ongoing charges are transparent and low, then keeping it may be reasonable — but only after you’ve compared apples-to-apples with term + mutual fund.

If you want protection — buy term insurance (large cover, cheap premium).

If you want wealth creation — invest directly in mutual funds/ETFs (transparent expense ratios, liquidity).

ULIPs can look attractive because they bundle both, but bundling rarely beats the optimized, separated approach for most investors.

When you see a chart that paints ULIPs as a one-stop solution, ask yourself two straightforward questions:

1. Who benefits most from this product — I or the seller?

2. Have they shown me the full cost math — not just cartoon illustrations?

If the answers make you uncomfortable, pause. 

Don’t let marketing or FOMO push you into a long-term commitment you don’t fully understand.

(Note: The views expressed in this article are personal and not associated with Republic Media Network.)